• Critical care medicine · May 1983

    Comparative Study

    The use of conventional ventilators for high frequency positive pressure ventilation.

    • J Abu-Dbai, E Flatau, A Lev, D Kohn, I Monis-Hass, and E Barzilay.
    • Crit. Care Med. 1983 May 1;11(5):356-8.

    AbstractTen randomly selected patients were ventilated for defined periods with 2 ventilatory modes: (a) high frequency positive pressure ventilation (HFPPV) (frequency 66-70 min; tidal volume 1-3 ml/kg body weight), (b) conventional IPPV (frequency 16/min; tidal volume (VT) 10-15 ml/kg). This was done successfully using conventional ventilators, and keeping other variables (FIO2, PEEP) constant. Various ventilatory and hemodynamic variables were measured and compared during both modes of ventilation. The most prominent finding was a considerable reduction of cardiac output (CO) and stroke volume (SV) during intermittent positive pressure ventilation (IPPV) compared with HFPPV. Peak tracheal pressure was significantly lower during HFPPV. An increase in mean systemic arterial pressure and in oxygen transport was observed during HFPPV, whereas transpulmonary shunt and pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) decreased during HFPPV. These findings are in accordance with previously reported advantages of HFPPV, and might be of importance in the treatment of patients with bronchopleural fistula, adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), left ventricular failure and other conditions in which conventional positive pressure ventilation (PPV) fails.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.