• BMJ Support Palliat Care · Mar 2017

    Increasing inpatient hospice use versus patient preferences in the USA: are patients able to die in the setting of their choice?

    • HurleySusan LysaghtSLNorth Shore Medical Center, Salem, Massachusetts, USA., Caitlin Colling, Laura Bender, Pamela S Harris, Joan K Harrold, Joan M Teno, Kevin A Ache, and David Casarett.
    • North Shore Medical Center, Salem, Massachusetts, USA.
    • BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2017 Mar 1; 7 (1): 46-52.

    BackgroundGrowth in hospice utilisation has been accompanied by an increase in the proportion of hospice patients who die in an inpatient hospice setting rather than at home.ObjectiveTo determine whether this increase in inpatient utilisation is consistent with patient preferences.DesignRetrospective cohort study.SettingSeven hospices in the Coalition of Hospices Organised to Investigate Comparative Effectiveness (CHOICE) network.Patients70 488 patients admitted between 1 July 2008 and 31 May 2012.MeasurementsWe measured changes in patients' stated preferences at the time of admission regarding site of death, including weights to adjust for non-response bias. We also assessed patients' actual site of death and concordance with patients' preferences.ResultsMore patients died receiving inpatient care in 2012 as compared to 2008 (1920 (32.7%), 2537 (18.5%); OR 1.21; 95% CI 1.19 to 1.22; p<0.001). However, patients also expressed an increasing preference for dying in inpatient settings (weighted preferences 27.5% in 2012 vs 7.9% in 2008; p<0.001). The overall proportion of patients who died in the setting of their choice (weighted preferences) increased from 74% in 2008 to 78% in 2012 (p<0.001).LimitationsThis study included only seven hospices, and results may not be representative of the larger hospice population.ConclusionsAlthough more patients are dying while receiving inpatient care, these changes in site of death seem to reflect changing patient preferences. The net effect is that patients in this sample were more likely to die in the setting of their choice in 2012 than they were in 2008.Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

Want more great medical articles?

Keep up to date with a free trial of metajournal, personalized for your practice.
1,694,794 articles already indexed!

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.