• Annals of surgery · Nov 2006

    Laparoscopic left lateral sectionectomy in living donors: safety and reproducibility of the technique in a single center.

    • Olivier Soubrane, Daniel Cherqui, Olivier Scatton, Fabien Stenard, Denis Bernard, Sophie Branchereau, Hélène Martelli, and Frédéric Gauthier.
    • Service de chirurgie, Hôpital Cochin, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Université Paris-Descartes, France. olivier.soubrane@cch.aphp.fr
    • Ann. Surg. 2006 Nov 1;244(5):815-20.

    Background Data And ObjectiveLeft lateral sectionectomy for liver transplantation in children performed through laparoscopy is an innovative procedure that was developed by considering our acquired experience in both laparoscopic liver resection and graft harvesting in living donors. The main goal was to minimize donor morbidity while preserving the abdominal wall. Herein, we report the technical feasibility and reproducibility, and compared it with open liver resection (OLR).MethodsSixteen successive donors underwent a laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) from 2001 to 2005. They were compared with 14 other donors who underwent a standard open liver resection (OLR) during a first period (1998-2004). First, this report describes the technical features of laparoscopic resection. Second, perioperative morbidity and graft characteristics were compared according to the use or not of the laparoscopic approach.ResultsLaparoscopic harvesting was successfully performed in 15 of 16 cases in an intention-to-treat basis. One conversion was required to ensure the quality of the laparoscopic repair of a left portal vein injury occurring during the pedicle dissection. No specific complication related to laparoscopy was observed. As compared with OLR, the operation was longer (320 +/- 67 vs. 244 +/- 55 minutes, P < 0.005). The blood loss was significantly lower in the LLR group (18.7 +/- 44.2 vs. 199.2 +/- 185.4 mL, P < 0.005). The morbidity rate was similar in both groups (18.7% in LLR vs. 35.7% in OLR). One donor in the LLR group experienced a bile leak treated by redo laparoscopy. Grafts were anatomically similar irrespective of the use of laparoscopy. The duration of hospital stay and use of self-infused morphine pump was not different between the 2 groups.ConclusionLeft lateral section harvesting by laparoscopy is a safe and reproducible procedure, allowing to obtain similar grafts as compared with laparotomy and can therefore be recommended to transplant centers that have previous experience in laparoscopic liver resection.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…