• Surg Neurol · Jan 2009

    National trends in spinal fusion for cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

    • Shivanand P Lad, Chirag G Patil, Scott Berta, Justin G Santarelli, Christopher Ho, and Maxwell Boakye.
    • Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
    • Surg Neurol. 2009 Jan 1;71(1):66-9; discussion 69.

    BackgroundThe objective of this study is to provide a retrospective analysis using an NIS database to examine national trends in outcomes for CSM from 1993 to 2002.MethodsData for CSM admissions (n = 138792) were extracted from the 1993 to 2002 NIS database to determine overall outcomes, as well as for those patients with CSM who underwent spinal fusion. Data from 1993 to 1997 (period 1) were compared with data from 1998 to 2002 (period 2).ResultsThe number of patients admitted with CSM increased 2-fold from 3.73 to 7.88 per 100000 US population. Approximately 10% of patients were admitted from the ED and 42% underwent spinal fusion. The number of patients with CSM that underwent spinal fusion increased 7-fold from 0.6 to 4.1 per 100000 people over the period from 1993 to 2002. Most spinal fusions were performed in the 45- to 64-year age group. The number of patients with 2 or more comorbidities increased from 20% to 37%; however, the mortality and adverse outcome rates remained stable, and there was a slight decrease in LOS.ConclusionsCervical spondylotic myelopathy is one of the most common disorders treated by spine surgeons. There was a nearly 7-fold increase in the number of spinal fusions for CSM from 1993 to 2002. Despite continued increases in patient medical comorbidities, overall complication rates have remained stable at approximately 10.3% and mortality rates constant at 0.6%.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.