• World J Gastroentero · May 2005

    Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial

    Effect of water-soluble contrast in colorectal surgery: a prospective randomized trial.

    • Jia-Hui Chen, Chung-Bao Hsieh, Pei-Chieh Chao, Hsiao-Dung Liu, Chung-Jueng Chen, Yao-Chi Liu, and Jyh-Cherng Yu.
    • Division of General Surgery, Tri-Service General Hospital, #325 Sec. 2 Chen-Kung Road, Neihu 114, Taipei, Taiwan, China.
    • World J Gastroentero. 2005 May 14;11(18):2802-5.

    AimPostoperative gastrointestinal-tract motility is normally delayed. Early feeding after colorectal surgery has been reported recently, but late feeding is common. Gastrografin not only enhances bowel peristalsis, but also decreases bowel-wall edema. Whether contrast medium allows early oral feeding and reduces the duration of hospitalization requires clarification.MethodsFifty patients underwent elective colorectal surgery in a regional medical center. Patients were prospectively randomized into a Gastrografin group or control group (n = 25 each). Patients in the Gastrografin group began their feeding schedule with 100 mL of 5% dextrose water with 100 mL of Gastrografin on postoperative d 3 and were advanced to a full liquid diet when the contrast reached the colon in 4 h. Patients in the control group began their feeding schedule with 200 mL of 5% dextrose water on postoperative d 3 and were advanced to a full liquid diet after the passage of flatus and stool. Nasogastric tubes were inserted for persistent postoperative vomiting. Fullness, nausea, vomiting, complications, time of anesthesia, time of operation, time of mobilization, time of oral feeding, and duration of hospital stay were recorded and analyzed with Student's t-test.ResultsIn the Gastrografin group, one patient had aspiration pneumonia and one patient had anastomotic leakage resulting in sepsis and eventual death. This mortality was excluded from the subsequent statistical analysis. In the control group, two patients had wound infections. There was no significant difference between the two groups at the time of anesthesia, time of operation, or time of mobilization. There were significant differences between the two groups in the time of oral feeding (3.3+/-0.3 d in the Gastrografin group vs 4.8+/-0.4 d in the control group; P = odds ratio--, 95%CI [-0.5 to +0.7 d]) and in the length of hospital stay (7.6+/-1.1 d in the Gastrografin group vs 10.2+/-1.3 d in the control group; P = odds ratio--, 95% CI [-1.2 to +1.4 d]).ConclusionGastrografin not only allowed early oral feeding but also reduced the duration of hospitalization after elective colorectal surgery.

      Pubmed     Free full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

Want more great medical articles?

Keep up to date with a free trial of metajournal, personalized for your practice.
1,694,794 articles already indexed!

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.