• Debra O'Meara, Eduardo Mireles-Cabodevila, Fran Frame, A Christine Hummell, Jeffrey Hammel, Raed A Dweik, and Alejandro C Arroliga.
• Department of Nursing, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio 44195, USA.
• Am. J. Crit. Care. 2008 Jan 1;17(1):53-61.

BackgroundPublished reports consistently describe incomplete delivery of prescribed enteral nutrition. Which specific step in the process delays or interferes with the administration of a full dose of nutrients is unclear.ObjectivesTo assess factors associated with interruptions in enteral nutrition in critically ill patients receiving mechanical ventilation.MethodsAn observational prospective study of 59 consecutive patients who required mechanical ventilation and were receiving enteral nutrition was done in an 18-bed medical intensive care unit of an academic center. Data were collected prospectively on standardized forms. Steps involved in the feeding process from admission to discharge were recorded, each step was timed, and delivery of nutrition was quantified.ResultsPatients received approximately 50% (mean, 1106.3; SD, 885.9 Cal) of the prescribed caloric needs. Enteral nutrition was interrupted 27.3% of the available time. A mean of 1.13 interruptions occurred per patient per day; enteral nutrition was interrupted a mean of 6 (SD, 0.9) hours per patient each day. Prolonged interruptions were mainly associated with problems related to small-bore feeding tubes (25.5%), increased residual volumes (13.3%), weaning (11.7%), and other reasons (22.8%). Placement and confirmation of placement of the small-bore feeding tube were significant causes of incomplete delivery of nutrients on the day of admission.ConclusionsDelivery of enteral nutrition in critically ill patients receiving mechanical ventilation is interrupted by practices embedded in the care of these patients. Evaluation of the process reveals areas to improve the delivery of enteral nutrition.

32 keywords...

hide…