• J W Meredith, J S Young, J Bowling, and D Roboussin.
• Department of Surgery, Bowman Gray School of Medicine of Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
• J Trauma. 1994 Apr 1;36(4):529-34; discussion 534-5.

AbstractTo evaluate the role of nonoperative management in the treatment of blunt liver trauma we examined all victims of blunt hepatic trauma admitted to our institution during a 36-month period under a protocol of nonoperative management. One hundred twenty-six patients had the diagnosis of blunt hepatic injury confirmed by abdominal computed tomographic (CT) scanning, surgical exploration, or autopsy. Twenty-four patients went to the operating room without CT scanning because of hemodynamic instability (16), peritoneal signs (two), or positive results on DPL (six). Ten other patients died of extra-abdominal trauma before reaching the operating room. The remaining 92 patients had CT scans of the abdomen. Of these 92 patients, 20 required surgery. The indications for surgery were hemodynamic instability (seven), peritoneal signs (six), nonhepatic injuries requiring surgery (five), and massive hemoperitoneum (two). Seventy-two patients were intentionally managed nonoperatively (55% of total liver injuries, 78% of scanned patients). Seventy (97%) of these patients were managed successfully without surgery. Of these 72 liver injuries, 11 were grade I, 28 were grade II, 16 were grade III, ten were grade IV, and five were grade V. The transfusion requirement in the first 24 hours for the nonoperative group was significantly lower than that for the group undergoing surgery (1.2 +/- 1.7 vs. 12.2 +/- 14 units). There were no instances of hemobilia, intrahepatic bile collections, or abdominal abscess in the nonoperative group. The grade of hepatic injury as diagnosed by CT scan does not predict the need for surgery.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

15 keywords...

hide…