• J Invasive Cardiol · Sep 2003

    Comparative Study

    Improved in-hospital outcomes in acute coronary syndromes (unstable angina/non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction) despite similar TIMI risk scores.

    • Francis Q Almeda, Robert C Hendel, Sandeep Nathan, Peter M Meyer, James E Calvin, and Lloyd W Klein.
    • Rush-Presbyterian-St. Luke's Medical Center, Rush Heart Institute, Chicago, IL, USA.
    • J Invasive Cardiol. 2003 Sep 1;15(9):502-6.

    BackgroundThe Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) Risk Score has been shown to predict prognosis in acute coronary syndromes (ACS) comprised of unstable angina (UA) and non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). We sought to evaluate the impact of newer antiplatelet and antithrombotic therapies for ACS, such as glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors (GPI) and low molecular weight heparin (LMWH), on in-hospital outcomes over time in patients (pts) with similar TIMI risk scores.MethodsThe baseline demographics and clinical outcomes of pts with ACS (UA and non-STEMI) in 1998 (Group 1998) and 2000 (Group 2000) at a single large university medical center were compared using a prospectively collected database. In-hospital major adverse cardiac events (MACE) included death, MI, or recurrent angina that resulted in urgent revascularization. Risk was estimated by utilizing the TIMI Risk Score, which uses 7 predictor variables: age > 65 years, at least 3 risk factors for coronary artery disease, prior coronary stenosis of 50%, ST segment deviation on EKG, severe angina, prior aspirin use, and elevated cardiac biomarkers.ResultsComparing Group 1998 (n = 563) and Group 2000 (n = 604), there was no difference between the mean TIMI Risk Score (2.90 1.52 vs. 2.91 1.52; p = 0.97), demonstrating a similar risk profile. Nevertheless, significant improvement in in-hospital MACE (9.1% vs. 2.8%; p < 0.001) was noted. The improvement in MACE was due to differences in rates of recurrent angina, without significant differences in death and myocardial infarction. This occurred temporally in association with a significant increase in GPI (1.0% vs. 8.3%; p < 0.01) and LMWH (0.0% vs. 15.6%; p < 0.001) use within 24 hours of presentation, and the increased utilization of intracoronary stenting (46.6% vs. 64.6%; p = 0.005), findings which were confirmed with multivariate analysis.ConclusionDespite similar TIMI Risk Scores, the in-hospital outcomes of pts with ACS have improved over time. This temporal change is associated with the greater use of newer antiplatelet and antithrombotic therapies and increased utilization of intracoronary stenting.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…