• M Bishop, W C Shoemaker, S Avakian, E James, G Jackson, D Williams, P Meade, and A Fleming.
• Department of Surgery, King-Drew Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90059.
• Am Surg. 1991 Dec 1;57(12):737-46.

AbstractThe objective was to develop a single branched-chain decision tree for both blunt and penetrating thoracic and abdominal trauma and to test its feasibility to track clinical decisions. The algorithm consisted of 14 specific patient management loops and 31 decision nodes. During a 4-month period, the management decisions and clinical course of 434 trauma patients were prospectively observed. Thirty-four patients had no signs of life on arrival to the emergency department (ED) and were excluded from the statistical evaluation; the remaining 400 patients constituted the study group. The mean Injury Severity Score (ISS), Penetrating Abdominal Trauma Index (PATI), and Trauma Score (TS) scores in the series were 21 +/- 10, 34 +/- 12, and 13 +/- 3. The overall patient mortality of the study group was 17 per cent; it was 61 per cent in those patients with major deviations from the algorithm and 6 per cent in patients who complied with the algorithm. The ISS, PATI, and TS scores were 29 +/- 9, 32 +/- 12, and 13 +/- 2 in patients with deviations and 20 +/- 10, 37 +/- 12, and 14 +/- 2 in patients who complied with the algorithm. Of the 37 patients who died with major deviations from the algorithm, the deviation was directly contributory to death in 21 cases (57%) and probably contributory in another 14 cases (38%). There were 108 patients with ISS scores between 20 and 50. In this group, mortality was 55 per cent when a major deviation occurred and 5 per cent without major deviations from the algorithm. The authors conclude that the survival of trauma patients may be improved by following the specific management criteria outlined by the algorithm.

45 keywords...

hide…