• J Palliat Med · Feb 2010

    Feasibility and effectiveness of the NEST13+ as a screening tool for advanced illness care needs.

    • Karen G Scandrett, Eva B Reitschuler-Cross, Lauren Nelson, J Alex Sanger, Maia Feigon, Elizabeth Boyd, Chih-Hung Chang, Judith A Paice, Joshua M Hauser, Alexey Chamkin, Paul Balfour, Alexei Stolbunov, Charles L Bennett, and Linda L Emanuel.
    • Buehler Center on Aging, Health and Society, Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois 60611, USA. kgscandrett@northwestern.edu
    • J Palliat Med. 2010 Feb 1;13(2):161-9.

    BackgroundA comprehensive whole-person approach might improve processes and outcomes of care for patients with cancer.ObjectiveTo assess the ability of NEST13+ (Needs of a social nature; Existential concerns; Symptoms; and Therapeutic interaction), a screening and assessment tool, to identify social, emotional, physical, and care-system needs and to improve clinical outcomes for cancer patients in tertiary care.Design, Setting, PatientsA controlled trial involving 451 patients hospitalized for cancer care at a comprehensive cancer center.InterventionPatients responded to 13 screening questions regarding possible care needs. When an individual response exceeded threshold levels, additional in-depth questions for the relevant need were asked. For patients in the intervention arm, clinical recommendations for each dimension of need were generated based on a previously developed NEST-response-driven menu, and were reported to the clinical team.MeasurementsDocumented needs, clinician response, patient perception of goals alignment, and overall quality of palliative care.ResultsUsing the NEST13+ tool in the clinical setting facilitated greater documentation of illness-related needs than routine clinical assessment. Improvement in secondary outcomes was attenuated: changes in the clinician response were modest; changes in outcomes were not significant.ConclusionThe NEST13+ tool facilitated identification of a wider range of important needs than traditional evaluation, while care outcomes were not improved. Traditional evaluation may need improvement. Future trials of the NEST13+ should focus on more intensive clinician-directed interventions.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.