• Dis. Colon Rectum · Mar 2015

    Comparative Study

    Laparoscopic IPAA is not associated with decreased rates of incisional hernia and small-bowel obstruction when compared with open technique: long-term follow-up of a case-matched study.

    • Cigdem Benlice, Luca Stocchi, Meagan Costedio, Emre Gorgun, Tracy Hull, Hermann Kessler, and Feza H Remzi.
    • Department of Colorectal Surgery, Digestive Disease Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
    • Dis. Colon Rectum. 2015 Mar 1;58(3):314-20.

    BackgroundThere are scant data on the presumed reduction of small-bowel obstruction and incisional hernia rates associated with laparoscopic IPAA.ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to compare long-term outcomes after open vs laparoscopic IPAA based on a previous study from our institution.DesignThis was a retrospective cohort study (from January 1992 through December 2007).SettingsThe study was conducted in a high-volume, specialized colorectal surgery department.PatientsPatients included those who were enrolled in a previous institutional case-matched (2:1) study that examined 238 open and 119 laparoscopic IPAAs.Main Outcome MeasuresLong-term complications, including incisional hernia clinically detected by physician, adhesive small-bowel obstruction requiring hospital admission and surgery, pouch excision, and pouchitis rates, were collected. Laparoscopic abdominal colectomy followed by rectal dissection under direct vision (lower midline or Pfannenstiel incision) and converted cases were analyzed within the laparoscopic group.ResultsGroups were comparable with respect to age, sex, BMI, and extent of resection (completion proctectomy vs proctocolectomy), consistent with the original case matching. Mean follow-up was significantly longer in the open group (9.6 vs 8.1 years; p = 0.008). Open and laparoscopic operations were associated with similar incidences of incisional hernia (8.4% vs 5.9%; p = 0.40), small-bowel obstruction requiring hospital admission (26.1% vs 29.4%; p = 0.50), and small-bowel obstruction requiring surgery (8.4% vs 11.8%; p = 0.31). A subgroup analysis comparing 50 patients with laparoscopic rectal dissection versus 69 patients with rectal dissection under direct vision confirmed statistically similar incidences of incisional hernia, hospital admission, and surgery for small-bowel obstruction.LimitationsThis study was limited by its retrospective nature.ConclusionsSome of the anticipated long-term benefits of laparoscopic IPAA could not be demonstrated in this cohort. The lack of such long-term benefits should be discussed with patients when proposing a laparoscopic approach.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.