-
- Ravi Suppiah, Anthony Doyle, Raylynne Rai, Nicola Dalbeth, Maria Lobo, Jürgen Braun, and Fiona M McQueen.
- Department of Rheumatology and Department of Radiology, Auckland District Health Board, Auckland, United Kingdom. ravi.suppiah@gmail.com
- J Rheumatol. 2010 Aug 1;37(8):1626-32.
ObjectiveTo determine the reliability and feasibility of a new magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) score to quantify bone marrow edema (BME), synovitis, and erosions in the cervical spine of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA); and to investigate the correlations among neck pain, clinical markers of RA disease activity, and MRI features of disease activity in the cervical spine.MethodsThirty patients with RA (50% with neck pain) and a Disease Activity Score 28-joint count > 3.2 had an MRI scan of their cervical spine. STIR, VIBE, and T1-weighted postcontrast sequences were used to quantify BME. MRI scans were scored for total BME, synovitis, and erosions using a new scoring method developed by the authors and assessed for reliability and feasibility. Associations between neck pain and clinical markers of disease activity were investigated.ResultsBME was present in 14/30 patients; 9/14 (64%) had atlantoaxial BME, 10/14 (71%) had subaxial BME, and 5/14 (36%) had both. Interobserver reliability for total cervical BME score was moderate [intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) = 0.51]. ICC improved to 0.67 if only the vertebral bodies and dens were considered. There was no correlation between neck pain or clinical measures of RA disease activity and the presence of any MRI features including BME, synovitis, or erosions.ConclusionCurrent RA disease activity scores do not identify activity in the cervical spine. An MRI score that quantifies BME, synovitis, and erosions in the cervical spine may provide useful information regarding inflammation and damage. This could alert clinicians to the presence of significant pathology and influence management.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.