• Burns · May 1996

    Quantitative microbiology in the management of burn patients. II. Relationship between bacterial counts obtained by burn wound biopsy culture and surface alginate swab culture, with clinical outcome following burn surgery and change of dressings.

    • J A Steer, R P Papini, A P Wilson, D A McGrouther, and N Parkhouse.
    • Department of Microbiology, University College London Hospitals, UK.
    • Burns. 1996 May 1;22(3):177-81.

    AbstractThe use of quantitative bacteriology in the burns unit has been thought to be efficient in predicting sepsis or graft loss. To examine the relationship between clinical outcome and bacterial densities on and in the burn wound, 69 biopsy/surface swab pairs were collected from 47 patients on 64 occasions, either immediately prior to excision and grafting, or at routine change of dressings. The mean per cent TBSA burn was 16 (range 1-65). There was a significant correlation between log total bacterial count by biopsy with total white cell count and age (P = 0.028), and a significant negative correlation between total bacterial count by swab with per cent TBSA (P = 0.006). There was no significant difference in bacterial counts between patients judged to be a clinical success or clinical failure (72 h follow-up), either after undergoing excision and grafting, or change of dressings, and no difference in counts between patients with perioperative bacteraemia and those without. With burns > 15 per cent TBSA, a relationship between bacterial counts and subsequent sepsis or graft loss still was not demonstrated. It is suggested that quantitative bacteriology by burn wound biopsy or surface swab does not aid the prediction of sepsis or graft loss.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…