• Acta neurochirurgica · Jan 1991

    Comparative study of different dorsal stabilization techniques in recent thoraco-lumbar spine fractures.

    • P Eysel and G Meinig.
    • Neurochirurgische Universitätsklinik Giessen, Federal Republic of Germany.
    • Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1991 Jan 1;109(1-2):12-9.

    AbstractThe authors initially outline the development of operative techniques to stabilize traumatic thoraco-lumbar spine fractures. Thereafter their own results in 125 patients, treated operatively between 1.1.1983 and 15.9.1988, are presented. The different techniques (Harrington-instrumentation, transpedicular plate stabilization, fixateur interne) are evaluated. In the clinical neurological examination 25% of the patients experienced an improvement by at least one point in the FRANKEL classification. Four patients suffered neurological deterioration. In the radiological follow-up the "Sintering" process, the kyphotic and scoliotic deformity of the spinal segment were measured. The fixateur interne had the best overall results (loss of reposition averaged a kyphosis of 6.8 degrees, no fracture instability). Less good results were obtained with both the Harrington stabilization (loss of reposition 9.1 degrees, fracture instability in 3 cases) and with the transpedicular plate stabilization (loss of reposition 12.4 degrees, fracture instability in 2 cases). Finally the complications are described. The optimal approach is based on the clinical development. The fusion should be as short as possible with a stable angle implant and the possibility to reposition intraoperatively should be given. Postero-lateral spongiosa application, fusion of the vertebral arch joints, diskectomy with transpedicular spongiosa application and intercorporal blocking should be considered.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.