-
- Brian Queen, Bryan Judge, and Jeff Jones.
- Emerg Med J. 2014 Feb 1;31(2):170-1.
AbstractA short cut review was carried out to establish whether the risk of thoracic aortic aneurysm can be assessed clinically at the bedside. 393 papers were found using the reported searches, of which two presented the best evidence to answer the clinical question. The author, date and country of publication, patient group studied, study type, relevant outcomes, results and study weaknesses of those best papers are tabulated. It is concluded that there are no prospectively tested rules to risk stratify chest pain for the risk of dissecting aortic aneurysm. The aortic dissection detection score might be useful but requires prospective validation in an emergency department cohort of patients with chest pain.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.