• Critical care medicine · Dec 1996

    Effect of hemocarboperfusion on organ blood flow and survival in porcine endotoxic shock.

    • V A Odnopozov, P F Laterre, R J Traystman, E K Tsybul'kin, R A Winchurch, and M J Breslow.
    • Department of Anesthesiology/Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions.
    • Crit. Care Med. 1996 Dec 1;24(12):2021-6.

    ObjectiveTo evaluate the effects of hemocarboperfusion on hemodynamics, organ blood flow, and survival in endotoxin shock.DesignProspective, placebo-controlled, animal trial.SettingResearch laboratory in a major university teaching hospital.SubjectsPentobarbital-anesthetized pigs.InterventionsTwenty-eight pentobarbital-anesthetized pigs (18.5 to 22.3 kg) received 100 micrograms/kg of Escherichia coli endotoxin (lipopolysaccharide 0127) over 30 mins. Group 1 animals (n = 14) were controls and had blood diverted through an extracorporeal circuit without activated charcoal for 60 mins after lipopolysaccharide infusion. Group 2 animals (n = 14) underwent nonpulsatile hemocarboperfusion (activated charcoal SCN-1K).Measurements And Main ResultsMean arterial pressure, cardiac output, systemic vascular resistance, mean pulmonary arterial pressure, pulmonary vascular resistance, oxygen delivery, and regional blood flow (radiolabeled microsphere technique) were determined at baseline and every 30 mins for 150 mins. Results are presented as mean +/- SD. Parameters in the two groups were compared by two-way analysis of variance. A p < .05 was considered significant. The survival rate was ten (71%) of 14 animals in group 1 compared with 14 (100%) of 14 animals in group 2 (p < .05, Fisher's exact test). The mean cardiac output at the end of hemocarboperfusion was 1.6 +/- 0.6 L/min in group 1 compared with 3.0 +/- 0.9 L/min in group 2, and remained lower in group 1 animals throughout the experiment. Pulmonary arterial pressure and pulmonary vascular resistance were lower in the hemocarboperfusion-treated animals during and after hemocarboperfusion. Systemic vascular resistance increased by 70% after lipopolysaccharide infusion and returned to baseline values in the hemocarboperfusion group but remained increased in controls. Oxygen delivery was lower in group 1 at 90 and 150 mins (287 +/- 34 vs. 478 +/- 48 mL/min and 251 +/- 24 vs. 356 +/- 21 mL/min, respectively). Blood flow rates to the brain (38.5 +/- 7.5 vs. 27.1 +/- 5.4 mL/min/100 g), large intestine (26.6 +/- 1.1 vs. 17.7 +/- 2.5 mL/ min/100 g), and adrenal cortex (200 +/- 45 vs. 139 +/- 41 mL/min/100 g) were higher in the hemocarboperfusion group at the completion of carboperfusion but not at later time points.ConclusionThese data suggest that hemocarboperfusion may be of value in the treatment of septic shock.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…