• Br J Neurosurg · Jan 1993

    The Westmead Head Injury Project outcome in severe head injury. A comparative analysis of pre-hospital, clinical and CT variables.

    • M R Fearnside, R J Cook, P McDougall, and R J McNeil.
    • Department of Neurosurgery, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
    • Br J Neurosurg. 1993 Jan 1;7(3):267-79.

    AbstractA prospective study of 315 consecutive patients with a severe head injury was undertaken to study factors contributing to mortality and morbidity, both in the pre-hospital and hospital phases. Entry criteria were a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score of 8 or less after non-surgical resuscitation within 6 h of the injury, or a deterioration to that level within 48 h. Patients with gunshot wounds or who were dead on arrival were excluded. End points of the study were either death or at 6 months after the injury. Predictors of mortality were increasing age, the presence of hypotension, a low GCS, abnormal motor responses and pupillary non-reactivity. In the 167 patients in whom intracranial pressure (ICP) was measured, raised ICP and failure to respond to treatment for raised ICP also predicted mortality. Three CT predictors of mortality were the presence of cerebral oedema, intraventricular blood and the degree of midline shift. When analysed using logistic regression, the most accurate model (accuracy 84.4%) included increasing age, abnormal motor responses and the three CT indicators. Analysis of the data for 'good' (Glasgow Outcome Score (GOS) 1 and 2) vs 'poor' (GOS 3 and 4) survival at 6 months was also performed using logistic regression. The model which provided the most accurate prediction of poor outcome included age, hypotension and three different CT characteristics, subarachnoid blood, intracerebral haematoma or intracerebral contusion (accuracy 72.5%).

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…