• Albère J Köke, Rob J E M Smeets, Roberto S Perez, Alphons Kessels, Bjorn Winkens, van Kleef Maarten M, and Jacob Patijn.
• Pain Management and Research Center, University Medical Center Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands; Adelante Centre of Expertise in Rehabilitation, Hoensbroek, The Netherlands; Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Research School CAPHRI, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
• Pain Pract. 2015 Mar 1; 15 (3): 256-64.

BackgroundEvidence for effectiveness of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) is still inconclusive. As heterogeneity of chronic pain patients might be an important factor for this lack of efficacy, identifying factors for a successful long-term outcome is of great importance.MethodsA prospective study was performed to identify variables with potential predictive value for 2 outcome measures on long term (6 months); (1) continuation of TENS, and (2) a minimally clinical important pain reduction of ≥ 33%. At baseline, a set of risk factors including pain-related variables, psychological factors, and disability was measured.ResultsIn a multiple logistic regression analysis, higher patient's expectations, neuropathic pain, no severe pain (< 80 mm visual analogue scale [VAS]) were independently related to long-term continuation of TENS. For the outcome "minimally clinical important pain reduction," the multiple logistic regression analysis indicated that no multisited pain (> 2 pain locations) and intermittent pain were positively and independently associated with a minimally clinical important pain reduction of ≥ 33%.ConclusionThe results showed that factors associated with a successful outcome in the long term are dependent on definition of successful outcome.© 2014 World Institute of Pain.

38 keywords...

hide…