• John Fox, Elizabeth Black, Ioannis Chronakis, Robert Dunlop, Vivek Patkar, Matthew South, and Richard Thomson.
• Department of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. johnfox@robots.ox.ac.uk
• Stud Health Technol Inform. 2008 Jan 1;139:44-62.

AbstractResearch on computer interpretable clinical guidelines has largely focused on individual points of care rather than processes of care. Whether we consider simple aids like clinical alerts and reminders or more sophisticated data interpretation and decision-making, guideline developers tend to focus on specific tasks rather than processes like care plans and pathways which are extended in time. In contrast, research on business process modelling has demonstrated notations and tools which deal directly with process modelling, but has not been concerned with problems like data interpretation and decision making. In this chapter we describe these two traditions, and compare some of their strengths and weaknesses. We also briefly discuss the distinct theoretical frameworks which have grown up around them, notably Petri nets for workflow modelling and mathematical logics for guidelines. We conclude that these offer complementary views of clinical processes and that a key research challenge is find a way of unifying them.

9 keywords...

hide…