• Critical care medicine · Apr 1995

    Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial

    Comparison of the effect of intermittent administration and continuous infusion of famotidine on gastric pH in critically ill patients: results of a prospective, randomized, crossover study.

    • A A Baghaie, M Mojtahedzadeh, R L Levine, R E Fromm, K K Guntupalli, and A R Opekun.
    • Department of Pharmacy Practice, Texas Southern University College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Houston 77004, USA.
    • Crit. Care Med. 1995 Apr 1;23(4):687-91.

    ObjectivesTo compare the effects of intermittent intravenous administration and continuous intravenous infusion of famotidine on gastric pH in critically ill patients.DesignA prospective, randomized, crossover study of continuous infusion and bolus administration of famotidine in critically ill patients.SettingA 14-bed medical intensive care unit (ICU) of a 500-bed county hospital.PatientsMedical ICU patients requiring stress ulcer prophylaxis.InterventionsPatients were randomized to receive an equivalent dose of famotidine by continuous infusion or intravenous bolus for 24 hrs, and then were crossed over to the other arm of the study.Measurements And Main ResultsCritically ill patients who met the inclusion criteria were randomly assigned to receive famotidine 20 mg i.v. over 10 mins, every 12 hrs or a continuous infusion of 1.7 mg/hr for 24 hrs. After a 16-hr washout period, patients crossed over to the other arm of the study. Gastric pH was monitored continuously for 24 hrs. A total of 710 gastric pH measurements were obtained for each phase of the study. The mean area under the pH-time curve for a 24-hr period was higher for continuous infusion than bolus administration (p = .05). Continuous infusion of famotidine maintained a gastric pH of > or = 4 over a longer time period than bolus administration (20.8 hrs vs. 12.6 hrs, respectively; p < .01). Onset of therapeutic gastric pH for continuous infusion was slightly delayed as compared with bolus administration.ConclusionsContinuous infusion of famotidine is more effective than an equivalent dose given by intermittent bolus in maintaining the appropriate gastric pH necessary for prevention of stress ulceration. Delayed onset of effect may warrant a priming dose when famotidine is given by continuous infusion.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.