• Burns · Sep 2014

    A retrospective analysis of securing autologous split-thickness skin grafts with negative pressure wound therapy in paediatric burn patients.

    • Michael Hoeller, Michael Valentin Schintler, Klaus Pfurtscheller, Lars-Peter Kamolz, Norbert Tripolt, and Marija Trop.
    • Children's Burn Unit, Department of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria. Electronic address: michael.hoeller@klinikum-graz.at.
    • Burns. 2014 Sep 1;40(6):1116-20.

    Background And AimDeep dermal and full-thickness burn wounds are excised and grafted with split-thickness skin grafts. Especially in less compliant patients such as young children, conventional fixing methods can often be ineffective due to high mobility rates in this age group. The aim of this retrospective single-centre study was to give an overview of our experience in the fixation of autologous split-thickness skin grafts (ASTSGs) on burn wounds by negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) in paediatric patients.MethodsA retrospective analysis describing 53 paediatric patients with burns or burn-related injuries who were treated as 60 individual cases were conducted. All patients received ASTSGs secured by NPWT.ResultsOf the individual cases, 60 cases with a mean age of 8±6 years (the youngest was 3 months, the eldest was 24 years old) were treated in a single procedure with ASTSG and NPWT. Total burn surface area (TBSA) was, median (med) 4.5% (3.0-12.0%). The TBSA of deep dermal thickness to full-thickness (IIb-III°) burns was med 4.0% (2.0-6.0%). The TBSA treated with ASTSG and NPWT was med 3.5% (2.0-6.0%). Take rate was, med 96% (90-99%) with a total range of 70-100%. The only significant correlation that could be found was between the grafted TBSA and the take rate. The smaller the grafted TBSA the better the take rate resulted, as expected. In three cases, major complications were noted.ConclusionTo sum up our experience, the NPWT system has developed itself to be a constant, well-implemented and useful tool in securing ASTSGs to the wound bed. The main advantage of the technique is a much higher mobility of the patient compared to conventional fixation methods. The high compliance rate of an often challenging group of patients such as children recompenses possible higher costs compared to conventional fixation methods.Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd and ISBI. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…