• The American surgeon · Aug 1997

    Comparative Study

    Sonographic examination of abdominal trauma by senior surgical residents.

    • S J Kern, R S Smith, W R Fry, S D Helmer, J A Reed, and F C Chang.
    • Department of Surgery, University of Kansas School of Medicine-Wichita 67214, USA.
    • Am Surg. 1997 Aug 1;63(8):669-74.

    AbstractThe focused ultrasound examination is assuming an important role in the evaluation of abdominal trauma. We evaluated the ability of senior surgical residents to independently use this technique. We also evaluated the efficacy of a single sonographic examination instead of serial examinations. Senior surgical residents underwent sonography instruction by two attending surgeons certified in the technique. Once proficiency was attained, a single sonographic examination was performed on patients with abdominal trauma triaged to a Level I trauma center. Residents obtained additional diagnostic studies deemed appropriate. Ultrasound results were compared with other diagnostic studies and clinical course. Sonography was performed on 518 patients between January 10, 1995 and June 30, 1996. Mechanism of injury was blunt in 92 per cent of patients and penetrating in 8 per cent. There were 22 true positives, 12 false positives, 8 false negatives, and 476 true negatives. Five of the eight false negatives were secondary to limited hollow viscus injuries with minimal associated intraperitoneal fluid. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 73.3, 97.5, 96.1, 64.7, and 98.3 per cent, respectively. The use of computed tomography and diagnostic peritoneal lavage decreased from 25 to 18 per cent and 3.2 to 0.2 per cent, respectively, as diagnostic tools. We conclude that surgical residents can competently perform trauma ultrasound. A single sonographic examination is effective and reliable. Sonography has essentially replaced diagnostic peritoneal lavage in our institution.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…