• Ann Emerg Med · Aug 1992

    Comparative Study

    Clinical predictors of bacterial versus aseptic meningitis in childhood.

    • C Walsh-Kelly, D B Nelson, D S Smith, J D Losek, M Melzer-Lange, H M Hennes, and P W Glaeser.
    • Department of Pediatrics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Children's Hospital of Wisconsin, Milwaukee.
    • Ann Emerg Med. 1992 Aug 1;21(8):910-4.

    Study ObjectiveTo assess the reliability of meningeal signs and other physical findings in predicting bacterial and aseptic meningitis at various ages.DesignChildren requiring lumbar puncture were evaluated prospectively for meningeal signs and other physical parameters before lumbar puncture.SettingEmergency department of Children's Hospital of Wisconsin.ParticipantsOne hundred seventy-two children, aged 1 week to 17 years, with meningitis (53 bacterial and 119 aseptic).Measurements And Main ResultsNuchal rigidity was present in 27% of infants aged 0 to 6 months with bacterial meningitis versus 95% of patients 19 months or older (P = .0001). Three percent of infants 0 to 6 months old with aseptic meningitis had nuchal rigidity versus 79% of patients 19 months or older (P = .0005). Seventy-two percent of infants 12 months of age or younger with bacterial meningitis has at least one positive meningeal sign versus 17% of infants with aseptic meningitis (P = .0001). Eighty-five percent of children older than 12 months with meningitis had at least one positive meningeal sign, 93% with bacterial meningitis, and 82% with aseptic meningitis.ConclusionDespite a lack of meningeal signs, a high index of suspicion for meningitis is essential when evaluating the febrile infant 12 months of age or younger.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

Want more great medical articles?

Keep up to date with a free trial of metajournal, personalized for your practice.
1,694,794 articles already indexed!

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.