-
Int J Older People Nurs · Jun 2011
Clinical TrialPredictive value and validation of the NEECHAM Confusion Scale using DSM-IV criteria for delirium as gold standard.
- Gill Sörensen Duppils and Inger Johansson.
- Department of Health and Social Sciences, Högskolan Dalarna, Falun, Sweden. gsd@du.se
- Int J Older People Nurs. 2011 Jun 1;6(2):133-42.
BackgroundDelirium is common among older people in hospital and various instruments have been developed for detecting delirium. One of these, the NEECHAM Confusion Scale, is easy for nurses to administrate but needs to be tested further.Aims And ObjectivesThe aim of the present study was to assess the validity and predictive value of the NEECHAM Confusion Scale.MethodsThe study was conducted among 149 patients aged ≥ 65, who had undergone surgery for a hip fracture. The patients were observed daily using DSM-IV criteria for delirium. The NEECHAM Confusion Scale was performed upon admission and prior to discharge.ResultsThe incidence of DSM-IV related delirium was 24%. Patients who scored below 25 points on the NEECHAM scale had a 12 times higher risk of developing DSM-IV related delirium. During admission, the sensitivity of NEECHAM was zero because all patients with DSM-IV delirium were excluded, the specificity was 75%. On discharge, it was 100% and 91% respectively.ConclusionsThis study adds to the body of knowledge that NEECHAM discriminates for delirium. It is a valid and reliable screening instrument for predicting delirium. The instrument can be used for clinical practice to identify patients who are at risk of contracting delirium and when considering prevention measures.© 2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.