-
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi · Nov 2013
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Comparative Study[The role of perioperative enteral and parenteral nutrition treatment in pancreatic cancer: a multicenter, prospective randomized controlled trial].
- Jun-chao Guo, Jian Li, Ya Hu, Tai-ping Zhang, Quan Liao, Meng-hua Dai, and Yu-pei Zhao.
- Department of General Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, China.
- Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2013 Nov 1;51(11):987-90.
ObjectiveTo compare the two different nutritional supports, enteral nutrition and parenteral nutrition in the aspects of nutritional conditions, immune status, the incidence of perioperative complications and quality of life impacts in pancreatic cancer.MethodsFor the pancreatic cancer patients which pancreaticoduodenectomy were performed from January 2007 to December 2008 in five high-volume medical centres, prospective, randomized controlled study was carried out. The enrolled patients were randomly divided into enteral nutritional group (EN group) and parenteral nutritional group (PN group). Related indicators, such as nutritional conditions, immune status, incidence of complications, general status and quality of life were assessed.ResultsThe 200 patients were enrolled, while 178 cases which 90 patients in EN group and 88 patients in PN group were qualified to evaluate. The 22 cases were dropped out. For the mean hospital stay ((23 ± 13) days and (27 ± 24) days respcectively), Karnofsky score and the life quality scoring, there are no statistical differences between the two groups. In post-operation day 7 and day 10, the prealbumin was (69 ± 16) mg/L and (80 ± 22) mg/L in EN group and it was (67 ± 19) mg/L and (70 ± 11) mg/L in PN group, which are all significantly decreased than preoperational levels ((186 ± 38) mg/L for enteral group and (179 ± 37) mg/L for parenteral group, t = -2.24, -2.13, -2.23, -2.20, all P < 0.05), but there was no statistically significant between the 2 groups (P > 0.05). Other general indicators such as the albumin, hemoglobin, total bilirubin, blood urea nitrogen, serum creatinine, serum potassium and serum sodium, revealed no statistical differences in the 2 groups (P > 0.05); The total lymphocytes, CD(+)3CD(+)4 and CD(+)3CD(+)8 lymphocytes in PN group was (0.687 ± 0.065)×10(9)/L, (0.363 ± 0.029)×10(9)/L, and (0.183 ± 0.018)×10(9)/L respectively in post-operation day 10, which they are significantly decreased than in preoperational levels of PN group and the respective counterpart of EN group in post-operation day10 (t = -2.04-2.83, P < 0.05). The 35 patients were suffered from different complications in the 2 groups, but there was no statistical differences among them (P > 0.05).ConclusionsEnteral nutritional support could not decrease the incidence of perioperative complications in pancreatic cancer patient, but it can improve the immunonutrition status in comparison with parenteral nutrition.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.