-
Zhonghua yi xue za zhi · Feb 2015
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study[Comparative study on the treatment of acromioclavicular joint dislocation: coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction using lateral half of conjoined tendon or tractusiliotibialis with hook plate fixation].
- Weijun An, Shaodong Qiu, Tao Zhu, Zewen Qiao, and Teng Ma.
- Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2015 Feb 3; 95 (5): 363-7.
ObjectiveTo explore the clinical outcomes of acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) dislocation treated with coracoclavicular ligament (CCL) reconstruction using lateral half of conjoined tendon and tractusiliotibialis with hook plate fixation. Comparative study on their advantages and disadvantages in order to provide the materials for the clinic.MethodsFrom June 2005 to June 2012, the patients with Rockwood type III or severer ACJ dislocation were randomly divided into 2 groups. They underwent CCL reconstruction using lateral half of conjoined tendon (conjoined tendon reconstruction group, n = 36) and tractusiliotibialis (tractusiliotibialis reconstruction group, n = 38) with subsequent fixation of hook plates. During the follow-up, the AC and CC distances were measured on postoperative plain films after a removal of hook plates. And the outcomes were assessed according to Karlsson criteria and Constant-Murley shoulder score. Ranked data were analyzed with the use of χ2 test and measurement date with two-sample t test. Results A total of 74 patients were followed up for an average of 20 (12 - 24) months. No significant inter-group differences existed in age, gender, injured side or classification. And there was no statistical difference in ACor CC distance between two groups within 6 months (P > 0. 05) after a removal of hook plates. The AC and CC distances of conjoined tendon reconstruction group were larger than those of tractusiliotibialis reconstruction group (t = 2. 313, P = 0. 026; t = 2. 114, P = 0. 041) within 12 months. The AC and CC distances of 12 months were both larger than those of 6 months (t =2. 631, P =0. 017; t = 2. 297, P = 0. 032). According to the Constant-Murley shoulder score, conjoined tendon reconstruction group was less than tractusiliotibialis reconstruction group (85. 2 ± 10. 2 vs 93. 1 ± 6. 9, t = 2. 965, P = 0. 006). According to the Karlsson Criteria, the excellent and good rate of functional recovery was 75. 00% in conjoined tendon reconstruction group versus 94. 74% in tractusiliotibialis reconstruction group (χ2 = 8. 111, P = 0. 044).ConclusionThe efficacy of Rockwood type III acromioclavicular joint dislocation for reconstructing coracoclavicular ligament using tractusiliotibialis is better than conjoined tendon. The AC and CC distances increase after a removal of hook plates while it is more obvious for conjoined tendon tractusiliotibialis reconstruction.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.