• R K Kharbanda, J Li, I E Konstantinov, M M H Cheung, P A White, H Frndova, J Stokoe, P Cox, M Vogel, G Van Arsdell, R MacAllister, and A N Redington.
• University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. r.kharbanda@rbht.nhs.uk
• Heart. 2006 Oct 1;92(10):1506-11.

ObjectivesTo test the hypothesis that remote ischaemic preconditioning (rIPC) reduces injury after cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB).DesignRandomised study with an experimental model of CPB (3 h CPB with 2 h of cardioplegic arrest). Twelve 15 kg pigs were randomly assigned to control or rIPC before CPB and followed up for 6 h.InterventionrIPC was induced by four 5 min cycles of lower limb ischaemia before CPB.Main Outcome MeasuresTroponin I, glial protein S-100B, lactate concentrations, load-independent indices (conductance catheter) of systolic and diastolic function, and pulmonary resistance and compliance were measured before and for 6 h after CPB.ResultsTroponin I increased after CPB in both groups but during reperfusion the rIPC group had lower concentrations than controls (mean area under the curve -57.3 (SEM 7.3) v 89.0 (11.6) ng.h/ml, p = 0.02). Lactate increased after CPB in both groups but during reperfusion the control group had significantly more prolonged hyperlactataemia (p = 0.04). S-100B did not differ between groups. Indices of ventricular function did not differ. There was a tendency to improved lung compliance (p = 0.07), and pulmonary resistance changed less in the rIPC than in the control group during reperfusion (p = 0.02). Subsequently, peak inspiratory pressure was lower (p = 0.001).ConclusionrIPC significantly attenuated clinically relevant markers of myocardial and pulmonary injury after CPB. Transient limb ischaemia as an rIPC stimulus has potentially important clinical applications.

30 keywords...

hide…