• Jia-ping Zhang, Fei Xiang, Da-li Tong, Qi-zhi Luo, Zhi-qiang Yuan, Hong Yan, Xiao-lu Li, Jian Chen, Dai-zhi Peng, Gao-xing Luo, Yi-zhi Peng, Yue-sheng Huang, and Jun Wu.
• State Key Laboratory of Trauma, Burns and Combined Injury, Institute of Burn Research, Southwest Hospital, the Third Military Medical University, Chongqing 400038, China.
• Zhonghua Shao Shang Za Zhi. 2012 Jun 1;28(3):165-9.

ObjectiveTo retrospectively analyze the effect of restrictive fluid management strategy (RFMS) on the early pulmonary function and the prognosis of patients with extremely severe and extensive burn.MethodsThirteen patients with extremely severe burn hospitalized from June 2010 to November 2011, being treated with RFMS in the fluid reabsorption stage, were enrolled as treatment group. Twenty-six patients with extremely severe burn hospitalized from March 2008 to November 2011, being treated with normal fluid therapy in the fluid reabsorption stage, were enrolled as control group. The match proportion between treatment group and control group was 1:2. Fluid intake, fluid output, fluid balance (the difference between fluid intake and output), and plasma albumin level from post burn day (PBD) 3 to 10, pulmonary oxygenation index on PBD 3, 5, 7, 10, and 14, occurrence of lung and blood stream infections from PBD 7 to 14, and occurrence of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), occurrence of other organ complications, and mortality within 2 weeks post burn (PBW) were recorded and compared. Measurement data were processed with t test and randomized blocks analysis of variance, enumeration data were processed with Fisher's exact test.ResultsDaily fluid intake of patients showed a tendency of decrease in both groups from PBD 3 to 10. Except for that of PBD 4, there was no statistically significant difference between two groups in fluid intake (with F values from 0.072 to 1.939, P values all above 0.05). Daily fluid output of patients showed a tendency of increase in both groups from PBD 3 to 10. It peaked on PBD 10 in control group and PBD 6 in treatment group. The mean daily fluid output was higher in treatment group than in control group from PBD 4 to 9, but without statistically significant difference (with F values from 0.001 to 3.026, P values all above 0.05). Fluid balance lowered in both groups, and it was the lowest on PBD 10 in control group and PBD 6 in treatment group. Fluid balance was lower in treatment group than in control group from PBD 3 to 7, and it showed statistically significant differences on PBD 4, 5, and 6 (with F values from 4.799 to 8.031, P values below 0.05). Plasma albumin level was higher in treatment group than in control group from PBD 3 to 10, with statistically significant differences observed on PBD 4, 9, and 10 (with F values from 5.691 to 10.551, P < 0.05 or P < 0.01). Pulmonary oxygenation index was higher in treatment group than in control group from PBD 3 to 14, with statistically significant differences observed on PBD 7 (respectively 372 ± 78 in treatment group and 291 ± 92 in control group, F = 5.184, P < 0.05) and 14 (respectively 354 ± 39 in treatment group and 283 ± 72 in control group, F = 8.683, P < 0.05). Lung infection and blood stream infection were respectively observed in 1 and 4 patient (s) in treatment group, and 9 and 11 patients in control group from PBD 7 to 14. Occurrence of ARDS, occurrence of other organ complications, and mortality were fewer in treatment group than in control group within PBW 2, though the differences were not statistically significant (P values all above 0.05).ConclusionsRFMS is a useful strategy in improving early pulmonary oxygenation of patients with extremely severe and extensive burn by promoting the process of fluid reabsorption and rebalance. This strategy may be also beneficial for the prevention of organ complications as well as a better prognosis in severely burned patients.

17 keywords...

hide…