• Spine J · Jul 2009

    Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study

    Effect of intervertebral disc height on postoperative motion and clinical outcomes after Prodisc-C cervical disc replacement.

    • Chan W B Peng, Martin Quirno, Martin Quirnoa, John A Bendo, Jeffrey M Spivak, and Jeffrey A Goldstein.
    • Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, NYU Hospital for Joint Diseases, New York, 10003, USA. bencwpeng@gmail.com
    • Spine J. 2009 Jul 1;9(7):551-5.

    Background ContextCervical total disc replacement (TDR) is an emerging technology. However, the factors that influence postoperative range of motion (ROM) and patient satisfaction are not fully understood.PurposeTo evaluate the influence of pre- and postoperative disc height on postoperative motion and clinical outcomes.Study Design/SettingRetrospective review of patients enrolled in prospective randomized Food and Drug Administration (FDA) trial.Patient SampleOne hundred sixty-six patients with single-level ProDisc-C arthroplasty performed were evaluated.Outcome MeasuresROM and clinical outcomes based on Neck Disability Index (NDI) and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) were assessed.MethodsPreoperative and postoperative disc height and ROM were measured from lateral and flexion-extension radiographs. Student t test and Spearman's rho tests were performed to determine any correlation or "threshold" effect between the disc height and ROM or clinical outcome.ResultsPatients with less than 4mm of preoperative disc height had a mean 1.8 degrees increase in flexion-extension ROM after TDR, whereas patients with greater than 4mm of preoperative disc height had no change (mean, 0 degrees ) in flexion-extension ROM (p=.04). Patients with greater than 5mm of postoperative disc height have significantly higher postoperative flexion-extension ROM (mean, 10.1 degrees ) than those with less than 5mm disc height (mean, 8.3 degrees , p=.014). However, patients with greater than 7mm of postoperative disc height have significantly lower postoperative lateral bending ROM (mean, 4.1 degrees ) than those with less than 7mm disc height (mean, 5.7 degrees , p=.04). It appears that the optimal postoperative disc height is between 5 and 7mm for increased ROM on flexion extension and lateral bending. There was a mean improvement of 30.5 points for NDI, 4.3 points for VAS neck pain score, and 3.9 points for VAS arm pain score (all p<.001). No correlation could be found between clinical outcomes and disc height. Similarly, no threshold effect could be found between any specific disc height and NDI or VAS.ConclusionPatients with greater disc collapse of less than 4mm preoperative disc height benefit more in ROM after TDR. The optimal postoperative disc height range to maximize ROM is between 5 and 7mm. This optimal range did not translate into better clinical outcome at 2-year follow-up.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…