• Martin Christ, Katharina Isabel von Auenmueller, Jeanette Liebeton, Martin Grett, Wolfgang Dierschke, Jan Peter Noelke, Irini Maria Breker, and Hans-Joachim Trappe.
• Department of Cardiology and Angiology, Marienhospital Herne, Ruhr - University Bochum, Germany.
• Int J Med Sci. 2015 Jan 1; 12 (4): 306-11.

Objectives And BackgroundDespite a generally broad use of vascular closure devices (VCDs), it remains unclear whether they can also be used in victims from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) treated with mild therapeutic hypothermia (MTH).MethodsAll victims from OHCA who received immediate coronary angiography after OHCA between January 1(st) 2008 and December 31(st) 2013 were included in this study. The operator decided to either use a VCD (Angio-Seal™) or manual compression for femoral artery puncture. The decision to induce MTH was based on the clinical circumstances.Results76 patients were included in this study, 46 (60.5%) men and 30 (39.5%) women with a mean age of 64.2 ± 12.8 years. VCDs were used in 26 patients (34.2%), and 48 patients (63.2%) were treated with MTH. While there were significantly more overall vascular complications in the group of patients treated with MTH (12.5% versus 0.0%; p=0.05), vascular complications were similar between patients with VCD or manual compression, regardless of whether or not they were treated with MTH.ConclusionIn our study, the overall rate of vascular complications related to coronary angiography was higher in patients treated with mild therapeutic hypothermia, but was not affected by the application of a vascular closure device. Therefore, our data suggest that the use of VCDs in victims from OHCA might be feasible and safe in patients treated with MTH as well, at least if the decision to use them is individually carefully determined.

26 keywords...

hide…