• E K Yeong, R Mann, L H Engrav, M Goldberg, V Cain, B Costa, M Moore, D Nakamura, and J Lee.
• University of Washington Burn Center, Harborview Medical Center, Seattle, WA 98104, USA.
• J Burn Care Rehabil. 1997 Jul 1;18(4):353-5; discussion 352.

AbstractThe subjective assessment of scar appearance is a widely used method in the evaluation of burn outcomes and the efficacy of treatment methods. The purpose of this study is to design a numeric scar-rating scale with better interrater reliability than has previously been reported. The rating scale assesses scar surface, thickness, border height, and color differences between a scar and the adjacent normal skin. Eight raters were trained with use of a standardized set of photographs that provide examples of the scores to be assigned to each level of severity of each scar characteristic. The raters then rated 10 photographs of different scars, referring to the teaching set of pictures for comparison. The intraclass correlation (interrater reliability) was 0.94, 0.95, 0.90, and 0.85 for scar surface, border height, thickness, and color, respectively. This rating system has proved to be a useful tool for the evaluation of scar surface, thickness, border height, and color.

8 keywords...

hide…