• Ann. Intern. Med. · May 1999

    Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Clinical Trial

    Use of tunneled femoral catheters to prevent catheter-related infection. A randomized, controlled trial.

    • J F Timsit, F Bruneel, C Cheval, M F Mamzer, M Garrouste-Orgeas, M Wolff, B Misset, S Chevret, B Regnier, and J Carlet.
    • Réanimation Polyvalente, Hôpital Saint Joseph, Paris, France.
    • Ann. Intern. Med. 1999 May 4;130(9):729-35.

    BackgroundThe risk for catheter-related infection seems higher with femoral catheters than with catheters inserted at other sites.ObjectiveTo evaluate the effect of catheter tunneling on femoral catheter-related infection in critically ill patients.DesignRandomized, controlled trial.SettingThree intensive care units at academic hospitals in Paris, France.Patients345 adult patients requiring a femoral venous catheter for more than 48 hours.InterventionTunneled or nontunneled femoral catheters.MeasurementsTime to occurrence of systemic catheter-related sepsis, catheter-related bloodstream infection, and quantitative catheter tip culture with a cutoff of 10(3) colony-forming units/mL.ResultsOf 345 randomly assigned patients, 336 were evaluable. Probable systemic catheter-related sepsis occurred in 15 of 168 patients who received a nontunneled femoral catheter (controls) and in 5 of 168 patients who received a tunneled femoral catheter (estimated absolute risk reduction, 6% [95% CI, 0.9% to 11%]). Time to occurrence of catheter-related bloodstream infection was not significantly modified (relative risk, 0.28 [CI, 0.03 to 1.92]; P = 0.18); 3 events occurred in the control group and 1 event occurred in the tunneled-catheter group. After stratification by treatment center and adjustment for variables that were prognostic (use of broad-spectrum antimicrobial agents at catheter insertion) or imbalanced between both groups (mechanical ventilation at insertion), tunnelized catheterization reduced the proportion of patients who developed systemic catheter-related sepsis (relative risk, 0.25 [CI, 0.09 to 0.72]; P = 0.005) and positive quantitative culture of the catheter tip (relative risk, 0.48 [CI, 0.23 to 0.99]; P = 0.045).ConclusionThe incidence of femoral catheter-related infections in critically ill patients can be reduced by using subcutaneous tunneling.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.