-
J Spinal Disord Tech · Apr 2012
Comparative StudyComparing vertebral body reconstruction implants for the treatment of thoracic and lumbar metastatic spinal tumors: a consecutive case series of 37 patients.
- Sharad Rajpal, Roy Hwang, Thomas Mroz, and Michael P Steinmetz.
- Center for Spine Health, Neurologic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA.
- J Spinal Disord Tech. 2012 Apr 1;25(2):85-91.
Study DesignRetrospective case series.ObjectiveTo compare different interbody reconstruction implants after corpectomy in metastatic spine tumors.Summary Of Background DataVertebral body reconstruction after corpectomy is common for patients with metastatic spine tumors. Although various implants are reported individually in the literature, no study to-date has compared them with one another directly.MethodsThirty-seven consecutive patients with metastatic tumors of the thoracic or lumbar spine underwent single or multilevel corpectomy with subsequent interbody reconstruction. Longevity of interbody graft was primarily evaluated in this study as defined by the need for any revision surgeries or complications after surgery. Data was collected retrospectively.ResultsTwenty-seven, 5, and 5 patients underwent reconstruction with metal implants, bone implants, and polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA), respectively. Twenty-three patients had metastatic tumor involvement of the thoracic spine and 14 patients had tumor involvement of the lumbar spine. Three patients (8.1%) required additional surgery: 1 wound infection, 1 hardware revision, and 1 for resection of an intradural, intramedullary tumor not identified at the first operation. Overall complication rate was 43.2% (16 patients) and 2 patients died within 30 days of their index spine surgery. Postoperative complication rates were more than double in the metal implant group (52%) compared with an equal number of complications in bone (20%) and PMMA (20%) implant group. The rate of revision surgery was highest in the bone group (40%) compared with none in the PMMA and only 3.7% in the metal interbody groups.ConclusionsVertebral body reconstruction after corpectomy for patients with metastatic tumors to the thoracic and lumbar spine can be performed effectively with metal, bone, or cement implants. Although metal implants are used in the majority of reconstruction cases, they seem to have a higher rate of overall complications, with bone interbody constructs showing a higher rate of revision surgery.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.