• Anaesthesia · Mar 1994

    Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial

    A comparison of three types of tracheal tube for use in laryngeal mask assisted blind orotracheal intubation.

    • S L Lim, D H Tay, and E Thomas.
    • Department of Anaesthesia, Kandang Kerbau Hospital, Singapore.
    • Anaesthesia. 1994 Mar 1;49(3):255-7.

    AbstractLaryngeal mask assisted blind orotracheal intubation is a technique that is best mastered under controlled circumstances. The influence of the type of tracheal tube, and positioning of the head, on the success rate of this procedure was evaluated in 90 gynaecological patients presenting for elective procedures under general anaesthesia. After induction, a laryngeal mask was introduced and its position was confirmed. Up to three attempts at blind orotracheal intubation using one of three tracheal tubes (Argyle, Portex or Kendall Curity) passed through the laryngeal mask were permitted in each patient. The success rates after a single attempt at blind oral intubation were 3.3%, 70.0% and 30.0% respectively (p < 0.001 and p < 0.05 when Portex was compared to Argyle and Kendall Curity types). After a maximum of three attempts, success rates were 30.0% (Argyle), 93.3% (Portex) and 76.7% (Kendall Curity). The first attempt at tracheal intubation was performed in the 'sniffing the morning air position' and this was successful in 52% of successful intubations; the second attempt using extension at the atlanto-occipital joint was successful in a further 35% of successful intubations; the third attempt used varying degrees of neck flexion and extension at the atlanto-occipital joint and this permitted successful placement of the tracheal tube in the remaining 13% of patients in whom tracheal intubation was possible.

      Pubmed     Free full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

Want more great medical articles?

Keep up to date with a free trial of metajournal, personalized for your practice.
1,694,794 articles already indexed!

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.