• S Aida, H Fujihara, K Taga, S Fukuda, and K Shimoji.
• Department of Anesthesiology, Niigata University School of Medicine, Niigata, Japan. aae62360@pop21.odn.ne.jp
• Pain. 2000 Feb 1;84(2-3):169-73.

AbstractPreemptive analgesia (PA) is effective in animal models but its clinical effectiveness remains controversial. We examined the effect of preexisting pain on PA. Subjects were recruited from patients needing orthopedic surgery. Some had presurgical pain (fracture surgery and arthritic surgery), while others had no presurgical pain (removal surgery for a tumor, nail or plate). Epidural morphine or a saline control was given preemptively before surgery and maintained until skin closure. Following skin closure, naloxone or placebo was injected intravenously to erase the aftereffects of the morphine. After total recovery, the PCA pump was set to inject epidural morphine. Pain intensity after surgery was measured by a visual analogue scale (VAS), and the amount of morphine used within 48h after surgery. PA was significantly effective for removal surgery, but ineffective for fracture or arthritic surgery. For the fracture and arthritic surgery PA treatment groups, there was a significant correlation between pre- and postsurgical (6h) spontaneous pain, while the corresponding control groups showed no significant correlation. Postsurgical VAS values in the fracture and arthritic surgery control groups increased significantly compared with presurgical VAS values. PA was effective when presurgical pain was absent, but ineffective when presurgical pain was present. We propose that central sensitization is already established by presurgical pain, and preserved until the termination of surgery. The ineffectiveness of PA did not depend on whether the pain was acute (fracture surgery) or chronic (arthritic surgery).

25 keywords...

hide…