• J Nurs Adm · May 2005

    Review

    A review of instruments measuring nurse-physician collaboration.

    • Mary B Dougherty and Elaine Larson.
    • Patient Care Services, Orange Regional Medical Center, Middletown, NY 10960, USA. mbd16@columbia.edu
    • J Nurs Adm. 2005 May 1;35(5):244-53.

    ObjectiveTo review instruments used to measure nurse-physician collaboration and compare the strengths and potential opportunities of each instrument.BackgroundNurse-physician collaboration has been studied using a variety of instruments. The ability to generalize the outcomes of studies and build on the findings is predicated on acceptable validity and reliability metrics of these instruments.MethodsA literature search using PubMed and Health and Psychological Instruments databases was conducted for articles published between 1990 and May 2004 to identify instruments measuring staff nurse-physician collaboration. After the instruments were identified, a second search was conducted to identify at least one peer-reviewed article describing the psychometrics of the instrument. Articles identified were then entered into the ISI Web of Science Citation Index to identify the instruments that had been used in at least 2 other studies. These selected instruments were then reviewed for the following information: background for the development of the tool, description of the tool, initial psychometric testing, and strengths and potential applications for each instrument.ResultsFive instruments met study criteria: the Collaborative Practice Scale, Collaboration and Satisfaction About Care Decisions, ICU Nurse-Physician Questionnaire, Nurses Opinion Questionnaire, and the Jefferson Scale of Attitudes Toward Physician Nurse Collaboration.ConclusionsThe identified instruments have undergone initial reliability and validity testing and are recommended for future research on nurse-physician collaboration.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…