• J Trauma · Dec 2001

    Do we really need routine computed tomographic scanning in the primary evaluation of blunt chest trauma in patients with "normal" chest radiograph?

    • A K Exadaktylos, G Sclabas, S W Schmid, B Schaller, and H Zimmermann.
    • Trauma and Emergency Unit, Inselspital, University of Berne, Inselspital, Berne, Switzerland. exaris@hotmail.com
    • J Trauma. 2001 Dec 1;51(6):1173-6.

    BackgroundA major cause of morbidity and mortality after blunt chest trauma remains undetected injuries. This study evaluates the role of routine computed tomographic (CT) scan.MethodsWe studied 93 consecutive patients from January 1999 to July 2000: 73 (76.3%) after motor vehicle crash with crash speed > 10 mph, and 22 (23.7%) after fall from height > 5 ft. Simultaneous with initial clinical evaluation, anteroposterior chest radiograph and helical chest CT scan were obtained for all patients.ResultsSixty-eight patients (73.1%) showed at least one pathologic sign on chest radiograph, and 25 patients (26.9%) had normal chest radiograph. In 13 (52.0%) of these 25 patients, the CT scan showed multiple injuries; among these were two aortic lacerations, three pleural effusions, and one pericardial effusion.ConclusionOver 50% of patients with normal initial chest radiograph showed multiple injuries on the CT scan, among which were also two (8%) potentially fatal aortic lesions. We therefore recommend primary routine chest CT scan in all patients with major chest trauma.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        

    hide…