-
Croatian medical journal · Dec 2003
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialPrilocaine versus plain or buffered lidocaine for local anesthesia in laceration repair: randomized double-blind comparison.
- Ozgur Karcioglu, Hakan Topacoglu, Cuneyt Ayrik, D Niyazi Ozucelik, and Suna Soysal.
- Dokuz Eylul University School of Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, 35340 Inciralti, Izmir, Turkey. ozgur.karcioglu@deu.edu.tr
- Croat. Med. J. 2003 Dec 1;44(6):716-20.
AimTo compare the effectiveness of 2% prilocaine plain solution, 1% lidocaine hydrochloride, and 1% buffered lidocaine in local anesthesia and pain reduction during injection in laceration repair.MethodsA double-blind randomized prospective comparison study included 183 consecutive eligible adult patients with simple lacerations, admitted to the emergency department between January 2001 and June 2002. Each of the three groups of patients received different local anesthetic before laceration suturing (1% lidocaine, 2% prilocaine, or buffered 1% lidocaine). The patients were asked to assess the pain intensity on a 0-100 numerical rating scale at the site of needle entry into the skin (P1), immediately after the completion of injection (P2), and after the first puncture of the suturing needle (P3). The differences among the three patient groups were tested with one-way analysis of variance and chi-square test.ResultsThe three groups of 61 patients each (one patient declined from prilocaine group) did not significantly differ in mean P1 scores (29.1+/-20.9 in the prilocaine, 32.2+/-22.9 in the lidocaine, and 33.2+/-21.7 in the buffered lidocaine group; p=0.56). Mean P2 scores were highest in the prilocaine group (24.0+/-16.0), followed by lidocaine (20.9+/-14.9) and buffered lidocaine (16.1+/-11.3) groups (p=0.007). Mean P3 score was significantly lower in the lidocaine group (13.4+/-11.3) then in the prilocaine (18.4+/-13.1) and buffered lidocaine (20.4+/-16.2) groups (p=0.014). The number of patients who required additional anesthetic administration in each group was not significantly different (p=0.09).ConclusionInjection of 1% lidocaine was associated with lower pain ratings on suturing needle puncture than with 2% prilocaine or buffered 1% lidocaine.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.