• Reg Anesth Pain Med · Sep 1998

    Randomized Controlled Trial Meta Analysis Comparative Study Clinical Trial

    Regional anesthesia does not significantly change surgical time versus general anesthesia--a meta-analysis of randomized studies.

    • F Dexter.
    • Department of Anesthesia, University of Iowa, Iowa City 52242, USA.
    • Reg Anesth Pain Med. 1998 Sep 1;23(5):439-43.

    Background And ObjectivesThe major determinant of variable operating room costs is surgical time. A number of factors contribute to surgical time. This study was designed to determine whether regional anesthesia decreases surgical time when compared with general anesthesia over several surgical procedures.MethodsA search was conducted for clinical trials that reported surgical times and which compared outcomes from regional versus general anesthesia. A meta-analysis of these trials was completed to determine whether, on average, among many surgeons and surgical procedures, the use of regional anesthesia affects surgical time. Confidence intervals were calculated and random effects meta-analysis was used to pool results.ResultsTwenty-six studies (with 1,874 patients) were used in the meta-analysis. Regional anesthesia does not significantly decrease surgical time versus general anesthesia (mean general minus regional difference was 1.7 minutes, 95% confidence interval -0.5 to 3.9 minutes).ConclusionsOverall, the use of regional anesthesia does not significantly decrease surgical time.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        

    hide…

Want more great medical articles?

Keep up to date with a free trial of metajournal, personalized for your practice.
1,694,794 articles already indexed!

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.