• J. Nucl. Med. · Jul 2007

    Comparative Study

    Comparison of contrast-enhanced MRI with (18)F-FDG PET/201Tl SPECT in dysfunctional myocardium: relation to early functional outcome after surgical revascularization in chronic ischemic heart disease.

    • Yen-Wen Wu, Eiji Tadamura, Masaki Yamamuro, Shotaro Kanao, Akira Marui, Keiichi Tanabara, Masashi Komeda, and Kaori Togashi.
    • Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
    • J. Nucl. Med. 2007 Jul 1;48(7):1096-103.

    UnlabelledRevascularization of viable myocardial segments has been shown to improve left ventricular (LV) function and long-term prognosis; however, the surgical risk is comparatively higher in patients with a low ejection fraction (EF). We compared contrast-enhanced MRI with (18)F-FDG PET/(201)Tl SPECT for myocardial viability and prediction of early functional outcome in patients with chronic coronary artery disease (CAD).MethodsForty-one patients with chronic CAD and LV dysfunction (mean age +/- SD, 66 +/- 10 y; 32 men; mean EF +/- SD, 38% +/- 13%) referred for (18)F-FDG PET, (201)Tl-SPECT and MRI within 2 wk were included. Twenty-nine subjects underwent coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), and LV function was reassessed by MRI before discharge (17 +/- 7 d after surgery). Two were excluded from outcome analysis (1 death due to sepsis; 1 perioperative myocardial infarction). The extent of viable myocardium by (18)F-FDG PET/(201)Tl SPECT was defined by the metabolism-perfusion mismatch or ischemia, in comparison with the extent of delayed enhancement (DE) on MRI in a 17-segment model. Segmental functional recovery was defined as improvement in the wall motion score of > or =1 on a 4-point scale. EF and LV volume change were used as global functional outcome.ResultsThree hundred ninety-four dysfunctional segments were compared, and the extent of DE on MRI correlated negatively with the viability on (18)F-FDG PET. Of 252 dysfunctional segments that were successfully revascularized, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of PET/SPECT were 60.2%, 98.7%, 76.6%, and 96.7% and of MRI were 92.2%, 44.9%, 72.4%, and 78.6% using the cutoff value of 50% DE on MRI, without significant differences in overall accuracies. In 18 subjects who underwent isolated CABG, improvement of EF (> or =5%) and reverse LV remodeling (> or =10% LV size reduction) was best predicted by the no DE on MRI, and patients with substantial nonviable myocardium on (18)F-FDG/SPECT predicted a poor early functional outcome (all P < 0.001).ConclusionAccurate prediction of early functional outcome by PET/SPECT and contrast-enhanced MRI is possible.

      Pubmed     Free full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.