• Eur J Nucl Med · Sep 2001

    Routine ventilation scans in children with cystic fibrosis: diagnostic usefulness and prognostic value.

    • A Jaffé, R Hamutcu, R T Dhawan, B Adler, M Rosenthal, and A Bush.
    • Department of Respiratory Paediatrics, Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Trust, London, UK. ajaffe@doctors.org.uk
    • Eur J Nucl Med. 2001 Sep 1;28(9):1313-8.

    AbstractKrypton ventilation scans (VS) provide an index of peripheral lung function, and may be particularly useful in children unable to perform pulmonary function testing. This communication reports on three linked studies which investigated whether a routine VS in young children with cystic fibrosis (CF) is diagnostically or prognostically useful. Study 1: In a preliminary study in 1991, VS were compared with clinical examination and chest radiography (CXR) in 50 CF children (29 females, 21 males) aged 0.4-5.2 years (median 2.2 years). The chest was divided into six zones, and abnormalities scored from 0 (normal) to 2 (very abnormal). Clinical examination was unhelpful in predicting abnormalities on imaging. In five children (10%) with a normal CXR, VS was abnormal, and in a further eight children (16%), CXR markedly underestimated VS changes. Study 2: In order to determine the long-term prognostic significance of VS abnormalities, we followed up 27 (19 females, 8 males) of the children from study 1, who had had their first VS at presentation at median age 1.6 years (range 0.4-5.2), scoring the same six zones from 0 to 2. Follow-up was for a mean of 11.6 years (range 7.8-14.8). Spirometry at age 7 years showed a mean forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) of 96% (range 46%-145%) and a mean forced vital capacity (FVC) of 96% (range 46%-145%). A poor VS score at presentation was correlated with percent predicted FEV1 at age 7 (r=0.4, P=0.042, 16% of variance explained). Those with a normal VS at presentation had a mean FEV1 at presentation of 99% (range 80%-129%). Whereas four patients had an abnormal VS, a normal CXR and a low FEV1 at age 7 years, no patient had a normal VS, an abnormal CXR and a low FEV1 at age 7 years. Study 3: Fifty children (29 females, 21 males) aged 0.5-6.0 years (median 3.8) were prospectively studied in 1998, to determine whether the findings in study 1 were stable over time, and to assess whether VS altered clinical management. Symptoms and clinical examination did not predict abnormalities on imaging. Thirty (60%) children had a normal VS while only five (10%) had a normal CXR. There was a significant correlation between the total scores of CXR and VS (P=0.007, 14% of variance explained). Further, VS detected additional abnormalities in seven patients (14%). Sixty-five percent of patients with an abnormal VS had modifications of treatment, including bronchoscopy, compared with 23% of those with a normal VS. We conclude that VS is a simple, safe and non-invasive technique giving additional information to that provided by clinical examination and chest radiography in a number of children with CF and can be used to modify clinical management. VS at presentation gives prognostic information, which may be of use in early intervention studies. Whether using VS to guide treatment improves long-term prognosis requires a larger prospective trial.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.