• D Moskopp, C Stähle, and H Wassmann.
• Department of Neurosurgery, University of Muenster, Fed. Rep. of Germany.
• Neurosurg Rev. 1995 Jan 1;18(4):253-7.

AbstractThe Glasgow Coma Scale is probably the most common grading scale in neurotraumatology all over the world. Its validity concerning severity and prognosis of the injury has been established in the Anglo-American literature. Data derived from the German rescue system, however is different from the Anglo-American in some respects. The analysis of a well-defined group of German trauma patients with moderate and severe head injuries (n = 299) shows that low Glasgow Coma Scores (GCS 3-6) established during the first two posttraumatic days must not correspond directly to the outcome after one year. Especially for the best Glasgow Coma Score during the day after the injury, GCS 4 had a poorer collective long-term prognosis than GCS 3. Therefore, German data from head injury studies based on the Glasgow Coma Scoring are difficult to compare to those cited in the Anglo-American literature. Any statistical analysis of a so called "ranking scale" which does not satisfy its own claims under special conditions is difficult.

7 keywords...

hide…