-
Multicenter Study
Semiological evaluation of pain according to its origin: a prospective, observational, and national study of current French medical practice.
- Philippe Bertin and Charles Taieb.
- Service de Rhumatologie, CHU Dupuytren, Limoges, France.
- Curr Med Res Opin. 2013 Jun 1;29(6):653-9.
ObjectiveTo determine how the origin of acute pain influences its semiological characteristics, and to evaluate the efficacy and safety of two Level 2 analgesic combinations in general practice.Research Design And MethodsThis prospective, observational, multicenter study enrolled patients who consulted general practitioners across France for intense pain that lasted ≥7 days and for which the physician prescribed paracetamol-codeine or paracetamol-tramadol. Completed physician (Day 0) and patient (Days 0-3 and Days 4-7) questionnaires provided data on the origin, characteristics, impact, and treatment of the pain, during the 7 days after the initial consultation.Main Outcome MeasuresPain intensity (0-10 unidimensional numerical scale), type (SF-MPQ) and impact on quality of life (QoL; SF-12).ResultsOverall, 1003 patient questionnaires were completed for Days 0-3 and 941 for Days 4-7. The origin of pain was most commonly disease or trauma. Mean baseline pain intensity was 7 (SD 1.3; 0-10 numerical rating scale), and was similar regardless of the origin. The time-course of pain differed according to its origin: more than two-thirds of patients with trauma/work accident related pain described it as being constant, whereas 43% of those with disease-related pain described it as recurrent/intermittent. The origin of pain also influenced its QoL impact: trauma/work accident related pain led to functional and/or professional temporary incapacity in 77% and 83% of patients (vs 63% for disease-related pain), while disease-related pain led to a change in mood and/or feeling of anxiety in 79% of patients (vs 47% [trauma] and 58% [work accident related]). Both paracetamol-codeine and paracetamol-tramadol reduced pain intensity by approximately 75% and were well tolerated. Key limitations relate to the observational study design, countered by advantages gained from the 'real life' evaluation of acute pain and its treatment in a general medical practice setting.ConclusionsAcute pain should not be understood as a single entity but as multiple entities with specific characteristics related to its underlying origin. Furthermore, our data suggest that, as already demonstrated in clinical trials, Level 2 analgesia provides effective relief of acute pain in 'real life' conditions.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.