• J Trauma · Aug 2003

    Cadaveric-biomechanical evaluation of bone-implant construct of proximal humerus fractures (Neer type 3).

    • Florian Fankhauser, Gert Schippinger, Kurt Weber, Sablatnög Heinz, Franz Quehenberger, Christian Boldin, Gerhard Bratschitsch, Rudolf Szyszkowitz, Leb Georg, and Anderhuber Friedrich.
    • University Clinic of Traumatology, Medical School of graz, Austria. florian.fankhauser@klinikum-graz.at
    • J Trauma. 2003 Aug 1;55(2):345-9.

    BackgroundA biomechanical cadaver study was performed to test the stability and strength of screw osteosynthesis of surgical neck fractures of the humerus.MethodsAfter bone density measurement, 64 cadaver proximal humerus bones were bent to create a subcapital fracture. The fracture was then stabilized by means of screw osteosynthesis randomly assigned to subgroups of screw positioning, size of screw, and stress test (torsion/bending).ResultsTwo screws applied laterally and parallel were 34.2% more stable than the normal arrangement. Bone density had a dominant role with regard to maximal bending and torsion force, but no significance was found with respect to additional screws through the major tuberculum or diameter of screws.ConclusionTwo of the smaller 4.5-mm cannulated screws should be applied parallel from the lateral direction. Only range-of-motion exercises that produce a bending stress should be considered early after surgery, avoiding axial stress.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        

    hide…

Want more great medical articles?

Keep up to date with a free trial of metajournal, personalized for your practice.
1,704,841 articles already indexed!

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.