• Chang-Wen Liu, Yong-Ke Zheng, Jun Lu, Wen-Hua Yu, Bo Wang, Wei Hu, Ke-Yi Zhu, Ying Zhu, Wei-Hang Hu, Jian-Rong Wang, and Jian-Ping Ma.
• Department of Crit Care Medicine, Hangzhou First People's Hospital, Hangzhou 310006, Zhejiang, China. liuchangwen3048@yahoo.cn
• Zhongguo Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2010 Oct 1;22(10):610-3.

ObjectiveTo explore if the new treatment with Lund concept could reduce the mortality of patients after severe brain injury.MethodsThis study included 68 severe brain injury patients in whom Gloasgow coma score (GCS) was 3-8, and in 30 of them Lund concept was adopted, and the other 38 patients were taken care of by the conventional treatment in controlling intracranial pressure (ICP). Furthermore, in patients of the Lund group and control group ICP and cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) were monitored continuously for 5 days.ResultsThe amount of mannitol (g) used was markedly smaller in Lund group than that in the control group (139.6±25.0 vs. 587.5±31.8, P<0.01). The 28-day mortality of Lund group was significantly lower than that in control group (30.0% vs. 57.9%, P<0.05). In Lund group, the incidence of ICP exceeding 25 mm Hg (1 mm Hg=0.133 kPa) or 35 mm Hg or lowering of CPP by 50 mm Hg observed in the non-survivors (n=9) was greater than that observed in the survivors [n=21, (45.0±23.2)% vs. (7.2±3.6)%, (40.2±18.6)% vs. (2.2±1.6)%, (35.9±12.9)% vs. (3.1±2.4)%, all P<0.05].ConclusionBy adopting the Lund concept, it is possible to reduce postoperative mortality after severe head injury.

20 keywords...

hide…