• M B Skrifvars, P H Rosenberg, P Finne, S Halonen, R Hautamäki, R Kuosa, H Niemelä, and M Castrén.
• Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Helsinki University Hospital, PO Box 340, FIN-00029 HUS, Helsinki, Finland. markus.skrifvars@kolumbus.fi
• Resuscitation. 2003 Mar 1; 56 (3): 275-82.

IntroductionThe in-hospital Utstein template for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) was assessed in four secondary hospitals (334-441 beds) which did not have systematic data collection.Materials And MethodsThe reports and outcome over a period of 12 months during the years 2000-2001 were evaluated.ResultsOf a total of 1690 patients that had a cardiac arrest (CA), 204 (12%) were resuscitated. Information on the collected Utstein parameters were available as follows: initial rhythm in 91%, time interval from collapse to defibrillation (in case of ventricular fibrillation or ventricular tachycardia as initial rhythm) in 90%, time interval to return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) in 83% and duration of resuscitation in 83%. ROSC was achieved in 69 patients (34%, CI 27-41%) and 34 (17%, CI 11-23%) survived to hospital discharge. Twenty patients showed satisfactory neurological recovery (10%, CI 6-14%). Eighteen (9%, CI 5-13%) patients were alive at 12 months from the event. Factors associated with survival to hospital discharge were VF/VT (P=0.007) as the initial rhythm and shorter interval to defibrillation (P=0.046).ConclusionThe in-hospital Utstein template was logical but laborious and it provided tools for resuscitation management evaluation in the study hospitals. For continuous use, a slightly compressed model may be warranted. In the present material, the overall survival rate to hospital discharge was in line with previous reports but there were somewhat less neurologically satisfactory survivors. There is an evident need to improve the outcome of patients suffering CA on the wards. An important step is to reduce the time interval to defibrillation.

16 keywords...

hide…