• European radiology · Sep 2005

    Comparative Study

    Role of contrast-enhanced MR venography in the preoperative evaluation of parasagittal meningiomas.

    • Alessandro Bozzao, Vanina Finocchi, Andrea Romano, Michele Ferrante, Fabrizio Fasoli, Giuseppe Trillò, Luigi Ferrante, and Luigi Maria Fantozzi.
    • Neuroradiological Section, S. Andrea Hospital, Via di Grottarossa 1035, 00189, Rome, Italy. alessandro.bozzao@uniroma1.it
    • Eur Radiol. 2005 Sep 1;15(9):1790-6.

    AbstractParasagittal meningiomas (PSM) may pose a difficult surgical challenge since venous patency and collateral anastomoses have to be clearly defined for correct surgical planning. The aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced (CE) magnetic resonance venography (MRV) in the preoperative evaluation of venous infiltration and collateral venous anastomoses in patients with PSM. CE-MRV was compared with phase-contrast (PC) magnetic resonance (MR) angiography, conventional angiography (when available), and surgery as a reference. Twenty-three patients undergoing surgery for meningiomas located adjacent to the superior sagittal sinus were prospectively evaluated. All the patients underwent both conventional MR examination and MRV. This was performed by means of PC and CE techniques. Both sets of angiograms (CE and PC) were evaluated by two expert neuroradiologists to assess (1) patency of the sinus (patent/occluded), (2) the extent of occlusion (in centimeters), and (3) the number of collateral anastomoses close to the insertion of the meningioma. Eight patients underwent digital subtraction angiography (DSA). All patients were operated on, and intraoperative findings were taken as the gold standard to evaluate the diagnostic value of MRA techniques. PC-MRV showed a flow void inside the sinus compatible with its occlusion in 15 cases, whereas CE-MRV showed the sinus to be occluded in five cases. CE-MRV data were confirmed by surgery, showing five patients to have an occlusion of the superior sagittal sinus. The PC-MRV sensitivity was thus 100% with a specificity of 50%. In those cases in which both MRV techniques documented occlusion of the sinus, the extent of occlusion was overestimated by PC compared with CE and surgery. CE-MRV depicted 87% of collateral venous anastomoses close to the meningioma as subsequently confirmed by surgery, while PC showed 58%. In the preoperative planning for patients with meningiomas located close to a venous sinus, CE-MRV provides additional and more reliable information concerning venous infiltration and the presence of collateral anastomoses compared with PC sequences.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.