• Spine · Sep 2010

    Comparative Study

    Responsiveness of the Bournemouth questionnaire in determining minimal clinically important change in subgroups of low back pain patients.

    • David Newell and Jennifer E Bolton.
    • Anglo-European College of Chiropractic, Bournemouth, United Kingdom. dnewell@accc.ac.uk
    • Spine. 2010 Sep 1;35(19):1801-6.

    Study DesignProspective single cohort.ObjectiveTo determine the ability of the Bournemouth Questionnaire (BQ) to distinguish between improved and nonimproved patients who present with either short (acute) or long (subacute/chronic) duration low back pain (LBP), and with either high or low baseline scores (severity).Summary Of Background DataRecent evidence suggests that the responsiveness of outcome measures used to determine clinical change is dependent on the chronicity and severity of the condition.MethodsData from 437 back patients undergoing chiropractic treatment were used for analysis. Patients completed the BQ before treatment and 4 weeks later. Patients also completed the Patient Global Impression of Change scale at follow-up. Responsiveness was determined by calculating Standardized Response Means (SRM) and by the area under the receiver operator curve (ROC) with best cut-point analysis. The minimal clinically important change (MCIC) was calculated by the change score with the best balanced sensitivity and specificity.ResultsThe responsiveness of the BQ at 4 weeks was dependent on both duration and severity of the condition. As expected, the responsiveness of the total BQ was greater in improved compared to nonimproved patients in the acute (SRM [95% confidence interval], 1.9 [1.7-2.0] and 1.2 [0.9-1.5], respectively), as well as in the subacute/chronic group (SRM, 1.7 [1.5-1.8] and 0.5 [0.3-0.7]), respectively. For the psychological domains, SRMs in the acute patients failed to distinguish improved from nonimproved patients (SRM [95% confidence interval], 1.3 [1.1-1.4] and 0.9 [0.5-1.2] for anxiety, and 0.9 [0.8-1.0] and 0.8 [0.5-1.2] for depression). In acute and subacute/chronic patients, the MCIC for the total BQ was 26 and 18 points, respectively. In patients with lower and higher BQ scores at baseline, the MCIC was 10 and 31 points, respectively.ConclusionThe BQ can distinguish between improved and nonimproved LBP patients but the amount of change needed to achieve this is lower in more chronic patients and in individuals with less severe presentation at baseline.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

Want more great medical articles?

Keep up to date with a free trial of metajournal, personalized for your practice.
1,624,503 articles already indexed!

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.