• Ann Emerg Med · Jun 1994

    Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial

    1% lidocaine versus 0.5% diphenhydramine for local anesthesia in minor laceration repair.

    • A A Ernst, E Marvez-Valls, G Mall, J Patterson, X Xie, and S J Weiss.
    • Department of Medicine, Louisiana State University, Medical Center of Louisana, New Orleans.
    • Ann Emerg Med. 1994 Jun 1;23(6):1328-32.

    Study ObjectiveOur previous study demonstrated that 1% diphenhydramine is as effective as 1% lidocaine for anesthesia in minor laceration repair, but that it also is more painful to inject. The purpose of this study was to compare 0.5% diphenhydramine to 1% lidocaine for pain of injection and adequacy of local anesthesia.Study DesignRandomized, double-blinded, prospective study from December 1991 through June 1992.SettingUniversity-affiliated, urban, inner-city emergency department.ParticipantsNinety-eight adults with linear skin lacerations without end-organ involvement were included; 48 received lidocaine and 50 received diphenhydramine.InterventionsWounds were anesthetized with either diphenhydramine or lidocaine according to a random table. Both patients and physicians rated the pain of injection and suturing according to a standard, previously tested, visual analog scale.Measurements And Main ResultsPatient and physician ratings were ranked without regard to treatment group, and rank sum scores were calculated for each group. General linear models and multivariate analysis of variance were used to analyze the ranked sum scores. The power of the study to detect a ranked sum difference of 15 was 0.8 with P < .05 considered statistically significant. Lidocaine was found to be significantly more effective as a local anesthetic for facial lacerations according to both patients (P < .002) and physicians (P < .004). There was no statistically significant difference between 1% lidocaine and 0.5% diphenhydramine for pain of injection or suturing for all other locations according to both patients and physicians. Overall mean and median scores for injection and suturing with diphenhydramine corresponded to the mild pain category according to patients.ConclusionAlthough not a replacement for lidocaine, diphenhydramine is a viable alternative for anesthesia in the repair of minor lacerations.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.