• J M Bartfield, P Gennis, J Barbera, B Breuer, and E J Gallagher.
• Department of Ambulatory Care, Bronx Municipal Hospital Center, New York 10461.
• Ann Emerg Med. 1990 Dec 1;19(12):1387-9.

Study ObjectiveBuffered lidocaine was compared with plain lidocaine as a local anesthetic for simple lacerations.DesignRandomized, double-blind, prospective clinical trial.SettingUrban emergency department.Type Of ParticipantsNinety-one adult patients with simple linear lacerations were enrolled. Patients with allergy to lidocaine and patients with an abnormal mental status were excluded.InterventionsEach wound edge was anesthetized with either plain or buffered lidocaine using a randomized, double-blind protocol. The pain of infiltration was measured with a previously validated visual analog pain scale.Measurements And Main ResultsAnalysis of pooled data and paired data (using patients as their own controls) revealed that infiltrating buffered lidocaine was significantly less painful than plain lidocaine (P = .03 and P = .02, respectively). There was no significant difference in the anesthetic effectiveness of the two agents during suturing.ConclusionBuffered lidocaine is preferable to plain lidocaine as a local anesthetic agent for the repair of simple lacerations.

19 keywords...

hide…